№ 06 · DOCUMENTREC / architecture-implementation-plan
candidate

architecture implementation plan

The implementation plan that set Astro, React adapters, Radium CSS, content collections, and static-first routing as the site foundation.

Architecture implementation plan and source inventory report.

  • architecture
  • Astro
  • React
  • Radium
  • static-first
DomaingovernanceVersion0.1.0Updated2026-07-01MaintainerazwerksProofpartial

Overview

01

What it is

The implementation plan that set Astro, React adapters, Radium CSS, content collections, and static-first routing as the site foundation.

Canonical facts

Domain
governance
Version
0.1.0
Updated
2026-07-01
Maintainer
azwerks
Proof
partial
  • The plan documents architecture direction; implementation quality is evidenced by separate records.
  • Later prompts may refine search, quality gates, and deployment without changing the core architecture.

How the record thinks

02

Key decisions

01

Decision

What should own routing and component integration?

ChosenAstro owns routing and static generation; React is used through `@astrojs/react` for existing Radium components.

This matches the design-system package, keeps pages static-first, and avoids recreating coded components.

Alternatives considered

  • Pure React app — Would weaken the static-first site direction without a concrete blocker.
  • Astro-only component ports now — Would introduce a porting project before the React source integration is proven.

Consequences accepted

  • Most surfaces render statically with React components server-rendered by Astro.
  • Interactive components require explicit hydration decisions.
Recorded
2026-06-30
Source
architecture implementation plan

Lineage

03

History

Operations

Planning

  1. Planning2026-06-30

    completed

    Set implementation architecture

    Documented the Astro, React adapter, Radium CSS, routing, content, and quality strategy for the site.

    Intent
    Prevent later prompts from guessing how the design system should be consumed.
    Action
    Evaluated integration options and selected Astro with `@astrojs/react`, global Radium CSS, and website-owned adapters.
    Result
    Foundation and surface implementation work had a concrete architecture contract.

    Search, full quality gates, and deployment details remain later phases.

How do you know?

04

Evidence

02

Architecture implementation plan

reviewed

Documents the selected Astro, React adapter, Radium CSS, content, routing, and quality-gate strategy.

File:
docs/azwerks-portfolio-architecture-implementation-plan-v1.0.md
Scope:
architecture

The plan must be read with later implementation reports for actual status.

Architecture source basis

reviewed

Links the architecture plan to the extracted Radium package inventory that informed integration decisions.

File:
docs/azwerks-design-system-source-inventory-v1.0.md
Basis:
source inventory

Unresolved

05

Open matters

01

Matter ledger

Open matters stay visible and separate from decisions.

Open architecture matters

  1. Open questionmat-architecture-quality-gates2026-07-01

    open

    Complete planned quality gates

    The architecture plan lists build, check, lint, design-system lint, contrast, accessibility, interaction, and visual checks.

    Position
    Keep optional gates documented as missing until the quality phase adds them.

    A passing build and Astro check do not equal full quality certification.

Links

06

Relations

Relations

How architecture implementation plan relates to the rest of the register.

Architecture basis

  • depends-onsource inventory process

    The architecture plan is based on the extracted package structure and component manifest.

Architecture outcomes

COLOPHON · № 06REC / architecture-implementation-plan
Created
Updated
Record ID
REC / architecture-implementation-plan
Version
0.1.0
State
candidate
Maintained by
azwerks
Derived from
Architecture implementation plan and source inventory report.

LimitsPlanning record; it should be read beside implementation and remediation records.